Left is Best at sucking cream - Instablogs
Left is Best at sucking cream
Ashish Banerjee , Gurgaon: Apr 24 2009
Made Popular Apr 25 2009
India :

Left is Best at sucking cream

To understand the polity of left parties of India, one needs to go back few decades of history when the left parties had umpteen numbers of versatile leaders. It was a period of enlarging the parties amongst the people of India, and who we had as leaders in those days.

There were Jyoti Basu, EMS Namboodripad, Harkishen Singh Surjeet, Pramod Dasgupta, Bhupesh Gupta, Indrajit Gupta, E.K. Nayanar etc. and they were all young, intellectuals and had all the wisdom of great leaders.

In 1969, during the legislative polls taking place in West Bengal, no party could manage to garner absolute majority of its own. Looking at the fractured mandate, an United Front was established to form a government in order to keep Congress away from it. Ajoy Mukherjee, the leader of Bangla Congress-a faction of National Congress, having a strength of hardly forty MLAs, became the Chief Minister and Jyoti Basu of CPM succeeded to become the Dy. Chief Minister, having the portfolio of Home, in the new Cabinet.

This government could not even last twelve months due to the internal bickering and blame-game amongst the allies of the newly formed Front. On one occasion, Jyoti Basu being the Home Minister, led a rally at Shaheed Minar, the heart of Calcutta, was engaged in criticising the competence of his leader, the Chief Minister, and spitting venom at him. The docile Chief Minister was so scared of his deputy, that he could not hide his fear of being arrested sooner. The government had to die an unnatural death, after that incident.

This story has similarity with the one that happened in July, 2008 when the current Left Parties had withdrawn its support from the UPA government. The Left parties withdrew its support a clear nine months before the general election. The relations between the Congress and the left through out the period of four years and three months were of less sweet and more sour.

It is not difficult to recollect that since the formation of the UPA government, the left parties had created at least ten moments, if not more, when they directly or indirectly warned the government to mend itself or they could use veto. Poor Manmohan Singh had to bow down or the omnipotent Sonia had to show her teeth to the crafty leaders of left parties in desisting from doing any wrong act.

Sonia persisted by reminding that their unreasonable demands could bring their common foe, the BJP, closer to the power. Every time the left leaders left from the porch of 10, Janpath, they maneuvered to come back with new issues, like moneylenders. If Manmohan had been blamed for certain failure, a lot must be due to the over-indulgence of the left parties or wasting time in pacifying the left leaders.

Was the nuclear deal so important for left parties as policy matter that they decided to dump the Congress? Surely not. After the completion of two years of UPA rule, the left were devoting its thought of getting out of bonhomie with the Congress. The reason was that they felt they were losing their vote bank in their bastion, West Bengal and Kerala where the Congress is the main opposition party.

Supporting the Congress to rule at the Centre became a thorn in its flesh. The State Committees of both the States of the Left kept murmuring about the ground realities. The people sought explanation, how one party opposing another in the State can sleep in one bed at the Centre?

This had made the party higher- ups sit up and take notice. During that period, the Left bosses were busy with having a luxurious life at the cost of tax payer’s money. Any one can ask Sitaram Yechuri, how many foreign trips he had made while supporting the government from outside?

The Indo-US nuclear deal came as a heaven sent opportunity for the left parties, and the cunning leaders pounced on to grab the issue by its neck. The Congress didn’t take it very seriously, but they were fortunate to save their government with the help of Samajwadi Party. The Left now knows that they would not be able to garner same number of seats, as they have in the present Lok Sabha.

Immediately after the announcement of the poll, they moved around all the regional parties to create a front that could form a government at the Centre. Surprisingly, even CPM boss Prakash Karat nodded when asked whether he would accept the post of PM, if situation so arises. Their manifesto for this coming election seems to be “beg, borrow or steal, so that we can suck the cream”.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Hemant
Varanasi, India
@ Ashish
You neglected so many positive aspects of left supporting the UPA. Do you think any secular government was possible without the support of left to UPA?
1 Stars
Chintan
Ambala, India
The current political scenario is indicating that there can’t be a government without the support of Left. It will be better for Congress to keep good rapport with left parties.
1 Stars
Salil
Kochi, India
Ashish
I think you have not studied the manifestoes of all political parties. The manifesto of left parties keeps a vision while the manifestoes of Congress and BJP are merely the copies of each other’s.
1 Stars
Prabhunarayan
Pondicherry, India
Sorry to say but you have gone partial while explaining the role of left in last five years. How can you deny that despite of the fact that out of 62 leftist MPs 55 had won the election defeating the Congress candidates, Left parties supported the UPA for keeping the BJP away from the main role at the centre. It was the pressure from the left that Congress couldn’t pursue the disastrous policies of LPG.
2 Stars
Prabhunarayan

It was the pressure from the left that has made Congress succumb to weak actions against Nxalites!!
1 Stars
Nitesh
Chennai, India
If you do remember the chronology of events for signing the nuclear deal then you will notice that left was opposing the deal from very beginning. In fact Manmohan Singh was under pressure from Bush to sign the deal. The left’s stand on deal was principled one while all other parties (including BJP) don’t have a clear stand on the deal.
1 Stars
Souransu
Calicut, India
Ashish
You are quite right. Left has always betrayed the people of India. At this time the only motive of Prakash karat is to be the Prime Minister of India, that’s why he is so busy in forming the so called third front.
1 Stars
Left has always betrayed Indians since freedom struggle.
2 Stars
@Hemant

One of the contribution of this secular government supported by Leftists have been the moves likes formation of Sachar Committee with Prime minister declaring that ” Muslims” have the first right over the resources !!It has allowed likes of Afzal to see the light of the day.That’s are some of the positive contribution of Left sponsored UPA government.

Want to know more ? Have a look at the article :

http://indowaves.instablogs.com/entry/the-upa-government-always-played-minority-card/
1 Stars
Wonda L
Earth, Canada
What your seeing is natural to all societies under the same circumstances and what has emerged is a party system characterized by a high degree of fragmentation and vigorous competition between parties, indicated also by a high rate of turnover in office at both the parliamentary and state levels. The multiplicity of parties means that a broader range of regional and social group interests finds representation and a share of power. This raises the question as to whether such large multiparty coalitions are functional from the point of view of political stability, governance and economic growth, particularly in a time of economic downturn in which the need for hard decisions might be unpopular in the short term. Political stability should not be reduced to duration; governments can last by crisis management, but this might be at the cost of governance and effective policymaking. If such governments are only suboptimally functional, then why can’t reforms be made to encourage mergers of small parties into larger, unified parties? A better idea would be to introduce incentives for state parties to merge voluntarily to form national parties spanning several states instead of multiparty coalitions, while preserving representation of the diversity of interests. To understand why this is not happening and why fragmentation has occurred, one needs to relate this phenomenon to intra-party democracy and to party finance.
The one on top wants to stay on top nature demands it
1 Stars
Gourhari Panda
cuttack, India
The left parties have been talking in the language of the Chinese as can be visualized from their stand on nuclear deal issue.They are a horde of untrustworthy crooks.Hyprocracy is their way of living,deception their principle,if any.The landlords shed crocodiles tear for the poors.They supposedly donot believe in God or elections but pray and contest.They are likely to be cut to size in the current elections.
Add your Comment